Yes! This is by far the number one program I've missed since I left Windows years ago. GIMP is so unfriendly, krita is for drawing, pinta is a very shallow clone that only just stopped crashing a few months ago. Paint.net is just better in every way.

~1960

ELIZA beat the Turing test and then everyone forgot about it. Humans are just really terrible at recognising robots.

Intelligence is still not well defined, and by more solid attempt LLMs absolutely are.

Intelligence, Knowledge and Sentience are three very separate concepts.

They moved from HBM to dedicated silicon and only got a 48x speed up? That is so, so, so much less than I would've expected. Any numbers on how it scales?

There's a zed minus the iffy bits fork called gram. Haven't used it though, I'm still stuck in Emacs trying to figure out how to get out.

I've looked at gram, but unfortunately it, being a fork of zed, still has some dependencies I'd rather not deal with. Given the recent hacks (especially those a few weeks ago with lots of compromised AUR packages in Arch) I'd rather not have npm or nodejs installed. I don't develop in it, I don't need it, and having it installed is just an huge unnecessary attack vector for me.

I do love what the gram developer is doing though.

Haha, I'm trying to figure out how to get in!

Doom Emacs is the answer

Anthropic basically downgraded all their tiers when they released Mythos, no nah, Sonnet 5 is the successor to Haiku 4.x

Emergent phenomena = pass/fail grading of multi part problems. If you're just gonna count it as a fail you're not gonna see the progress until everything works, even if every single subproblem improves linearly.

No? That would mean implementation defined, not undefined.

No, you can't assume it. You can trust them as they made that claim outright. Or you can choose to not trust them, I guess

It's not potentially, it's settled. At least for now as neither case wanted to move on to appeals

Not at all. The ruling came from a federal district court, and since it was settled early, it was never reviewed by a higher court. It doesn't set a national precedent across the U.S.

And other district courts don't agree on this. The US district court for Delaware recently rejected a fair use defense for the use of copyrighted works to train AI. https://www.reedsmith.com/articles/court-ai-fair-use-thomson...

There are more cases in the pipeline. The massive NYT vs OpenAI is still ongoing. Nothing will be "settled" until this makes its way to the Supreme Court or Congress steps in.