Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Tar90's comments login

It's probably Mbabaram.

> When Dixon finally managed to meet Bennett, he began his study of the language by eliciting a few basic nouns; among the first of these was the word for "dog". Bennett supplied the Mbabaram translation, dog. Dixon suspected that Bennett had not understood the question, or that Bennett's knowledge of Mbabaram had been tainted by decades of using English. But it turned out that the Mbabaram word for "dog" was in fact dúg,[2] pronounced almost identically to the Australian English word (compare true cognates such as Yidiny gudaga, Dyirbal guda, Djabugay gurraa and Guugu Yimidhirr gudaa, for example[3]). The similarity is a complete coincidence [...].

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mbabaram_language


Degrowth is really about scaling back on the over-the-top way we live. It's about finding a sweet spot where people live well but not at the expense of everything else. It’s cool and useful that solar is cheap, but degrowth means chill on the endless buying and using and discarding stuff, be sustainable and make sure everyone gets a fair shake, not just those who can afford it.


Consuming more thoughtfully is cool and all, but it's not going to save the climate.


Could it be the prevalence of ophthalmologists instead? I assume it was really hard to get good medical care100 to 200 years ago, not to mention the cost of glasses.


>Could it be the prevalence of ophthalmologists instead?

It's orthogonal. More doctors would mean more diagnosis. But more short distance indoors fixed focus screen work stress on the eyes would also mean more patients.

Too little time outdoors

Research has found that spending time playing outside as a child may reduce your chances of becoming short-sighted, and existing short-sightedness may progress less quickly.

This may be related to light levels outdoors being much brighter than indoors. Both sport and relaxation outdoors appear to be beneficial in reducing the risk of short-sightedness.

Excessive close work

Spending a lot of time focusing your eyes on nearby objects, such as reading, writing and possibly using hand-held devices (phones and tablets) and computers can also increase your risk of developing short-sightedness.

An "everything in moderation" approach is therefore generally recommended. Although children should be encouraged to read, they should also spend some time away from reading and computer games each day doing outdoor activities.

https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/short-sightedness/causes/


The signals propagate at the exact speed of light, but you're on point on the risk being minimal. Space is big.


I'm not the grandparent poster, but I think that "even if they moved at a fraction of speed of light" refers to the responding civilisation's space vessels, not their return signal.


Let's say you receive an EM signal from a sentient specie.

If you pinpoint its origin to light years away, you know they already had a lot of time to progress past this technology. A good response if you plan on eliminating them would not be a fleet: you'd better setup and direct a huge gamma-ray burst in their general direction.

So the destructive response could come at the speed of light with a little delay at first.


Destroying and replacing are very much orthogonal to each other.


How does that work? Never heard of traffic arbitrage before.


Essentially it is, build doorways that attract targeted traffic in some categories, and sell that traffic to porn sites... sounds simple, very hard to do profitably and requires both decades of experience, being extremely smart, and some luck.

("don't try to repeat this trick at home" disclaimer goes here)


Plus, these games are deterministic, whereas everything in life is a stochastic process.


Only because you lack information.


Actually at the lowest level there's this whole quantum business that says exactly otherwise.


That is unlikely to affect the microscopic world. The physics of everyday life are deterministic, no need to invoke quantum mechanics.


GGGP didn't do that, they made a link with chaos theory and that's decidedly not deterministic.

And I think you meant to say 'macroscopic'.


GGGP?

And yes, I did mean macroscopic, sorry.


Cold war indeed.


For those interested, there's a nice discussion on the topic of Eichmann and the book on Yale's course Moral Foundations of Politics, in coursera.


The infamous tyranny of majority. That's why we have mechanisms in place in society to ensure fair representation.


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: