Giphy also does not have a privacy policy for their Firefox extension, but run an analytics script, which I wrote about and sent them an email to which they ignored me despite sending conformation of receiving it.
No way to know the data being collected, or opt out.
First link is actually extending privacy outside the house. So it's very much not making fences fuzzy.
The second link is basically about the wavelength you use when looking at the outside of the house. Not surprisingly, it doesn't matter. This is common sense, not a revelation.
A challenge to my comment would be if a house had a picket fence, somebody came by and took a hoe from the yard, and a judge said "nah, it's not theft, the fence was too low, all he had to do was reach out and take it". That would be a proper counter-argument.
You say essentially state that my information is not a “proper counter-argument.”, while in the same response argue that I am wrong because this is “this is common sense”, rather than any real response.
The court recognized there was a fence for privacy, but that is was applicable to certain situations, for example, the purpose of the recording. So it would be fine to record someone if they were in the background of your picture, but not if was for sexual purposes. Hence the numerous criteria to be considered.
So its very much about making fences fuzzy, since they only apply to certain types of filming, the purpose, personal attributes....etc.
Thermal imaging and its effects on the fourth are not common sense. Thermal imaging was initially ruled to be fine, then appealed, ruled fine, then it ruled to not be fine, but only with a 5 - 4 ruling. With the dissenting opinion including “Heat waves, like aromas that are generated in a kitchen, or in a laboratory or opium den, enter the public domain if and when they leave a building.”
All you would have to do is read the Wikipedia article I gave to see that “Scalia's phrases "sense-enhancing technology" and "device that is not in general public use" in the Kyllo ruling have become influential in later rulings on police search procedures, but in an inconsistent fashion.[22] Several scholars and legal analysts noted the ambiguity in Scalia's use of those phrases.
To use your example, a police officer could “reach over” and see the illegal activity with his own eyes through a hole in your fence and that is legal. However, they could not use binoculars to get over your fence from a public area.
I'm not at my best to argue this, since it's evening here and I had a couple of glasses of wine with dinner. But my first instinct is to comment on how the case you're describing is at the edge of the law, where things are naturally fuzzy, as most borders are. So we're talking about an edge case of a metaphor - quite a bit removed from the main topic.
I stand by my previous example - a proper counter-example would be somebody reaching over the fence and stealing something. My main argument is that any password signifies a fence - be it a tall wall or a picket fence. Going beyond it is clearly not ok. Law and custom carve exceptions for white hats looking for security flaws - but both law and custom also specify how those white hats are supposed to behave. And a 3 day ultimatum followed by public disclosure is not it.
These accusations have been made for some time now and they have cycled through popularity several times. Each time I have yet to see any proof.
Of course, with the recent news they are getting more attention, and once again, we have it surface. I will admit it’s a little weird that he has not sued her for such ruinous claims, but this is a family issue, so I can understand not escalating the issue.
As the author concludes, "However, Annie has not yet provided what I would consider direct / indisputable proof that her claims are true. Thus, rationally, I must consider Sam Altman innocent.”
To those complaining that this topic keeps getting removed from YC, imagine if every random allegation (with no proof) against some CEO got discussed.
I personally flagged this post as I have seen the same allegations with no change in information posted so many times.
Multisig would have been a good start for securing $500K.
I always assumed that "security minded" cryptocurrency people would have a good security model, but as this and the Lastpass breach shows, they don't practice what they preach. Also, love the deflection of blame to the Lastpass crypto thefts. If it was never stored there, it can't be from that.
I love how crypto is all about removing trust, and then the developers put all their trust in a single person.
I mean, it's nice to have the ports, but you have externally power the drives because the PSU is 3A, so one for the computer and that leaves 2A. Most HDDs need 2A to spin up so you can only have one drive. So no redundancy.
If I was to make a NAS (which is what I would be interested in) I would pay triple for something like the NAS killer 6 [3]. To be fair the Zimacube might be more of a challenge to this (but its not out yet).
I think its interesting though for a small, fanless sever. But (understandably, it's cheap) if you wanted something more, an extra $200 would be get you much more. I guess it depends on what you are looking for.
So Kickstarter compute blade which is not shipping yet, zimacube which is not shipping yet, or build-your-own for more money which is not really the same category as the zimaboard. Those are not great alternatives today.
Zimaboard came out of kickstarter a year and a half ago. Patience is a virtue.
Another reason why there aren't that many alternatives is that you can't use it for that much. It's like buying a car that can carry 50 kg. Great if thats your use case, but if you want anything more, there's no point. I can't really use it as a NAS, firewall etc. I think it certainly has uses, they are just ones that the average NAS/server people can do with a stronger server that can also do nextcloud, pi-hole, etc, in one, rather than have a device for each (which is way more costly).
No way to know the data being collected, or opt out.
https://www.coloursofosint.com/posts/Investigating-Firefox-P...