Let say there's 100 tickets available but 200 people wanting to go.
You are saying the right price is the price that only the richer half can afford right?
Sort of, I'm saying that if the price becomes that, it's ok as a concert is not essential for life, it's not even essential for a good life. Of course that's simply my opinion.
Your opinion implies that money is more important than anything else. If it makes most money, then it's the right thing to do.
I disagree with your opinion. Money is just a middleman - and a mathematical device used by the cunning to take everything away from everyone else and essencially enslave the world.
That's one way to read it.
I personally imply no such thing.
My opinion is that if something is neither essential for life, nor for a good life, it is unimportant.
Any other lines someons draws are their opinion, which they are most free to have.
I see. I disagree with that opinion, too. Where would you draw the line between "unimportant" and "important" - therefore, between prices that should and should not be (allowed to be) maximized for the sake of profit?
Food, water and shelter is obvious. Is there anything else you consider important except those three? If not, would you be willing to live a life where the only things available to you are food, water and shelter - i.e. a life of a prison inmate, or a labour slave?
> My opinion stops where written. This was fun though!
You have incorporated the word "important" into your opinion, but you haven't explained what you mean by that word. Walking away from a discussion like that without explaining what you mean by the (subjective) word you used is nothing short of rude. Especially combined with the snarky remark about your own entertainment.
If you want to spill out your opinions, without engaging in further discussion when asked, feel free to open a personal blog.
There is a BOTW map app[1] from which the developper makes some money, I assume it to be illegal too but Nintendo has not taken it down. Maybe Nintendo allows that kind of side project to be made after all?
I first thought it was some kind of april fool's joke. Many people who care about climate change are taking their bike to go to work, or avoiding taking a plane for their holidays, and then there's this. I am genuinely shocked.
The reason that message has that addressee is because the To: is protected by the DKIM signature, so whoever relayed the message cannot have changed it.
His claim about a sailboat not being able to exceed windspeed sailing directly downwind is deceiving because it is definitely not the fastest point of sail. I believe this is done for dramatic effect to make Blackbird's feat sound more incredible. Sailing close hauled, almost directly into the wind, can achieve double wind speeds near effortlessly on low draft racing multihulls, and possibly on land with whatever those sailing carts are called. Of course, directly downwind is the only course for this experimental propellor craft, thus the only criteria.
But that's the entire point of Blackbird: to show that it is possible to sail directly downwind faster than the wind. It is not immediately obvious that this is possible.
