PWA is the most universal installer available. You can install a PWA with Firefox, but the instructions might look different from the screenshot in the repo. Alternatively you can use it at the hosted URL in the github readme without installing at all.

An up-to-date Firefox install gives me this message when I even go to the site:

> Sorry, your browser does not support the File System Access API. Plese consider using another browser for installing this app.

Firefox also seems to require an extension to install PWAs: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/pwas-for-fire... (and not just an extension, but a couple of external programs need to be installed too).

So you can jump through the extra hoops to get the PWA installed, but the first warning seems accurate. Can't load or save files.

Yes, this API is only available in Chrome and Edge on PCs it seems: https://caniuse.com/?search=filesystem%20access%20api

I'm not clear how Trump's assurances mean much in the face of a law passed by Congress and upheld by the Supreme Court. I guess we're already in an autocracy controlled by a person not even formally in power yet?

You can also read this as despite being banned TikTok expects 2/3 users to find ways to circumvent the ban

Not sure if you're trolling but otherwise genuinely perplexed by how you could draw this conclusion from the above post.

I think it’s pretty clear, a system where a family can’t guarantee their offsprings success is one where the family is unable to do anything to improve their children’s fates.

I recently read a piece of local news on housing policies (Austin, TX) and the journalist made the observation that affordable housing is inevitably tied to reducing property values, which is a major source of wealth for older generations. It made me realize why some folks would be against zoning changes and other pro-housing policies, because it might actually impact their personal wealth. I don't know why I never correlated the two before.

This isn't a bad reply but it's fairly off topic in my opinion. I think the majority of reviews on my PR are effectively rubber stamps, but sometimes it takes many business days to get that rubber stamp unless I bug people.

My assumption was that you didn’t have a group of people who would rubber stamp your PR based on the frustration with the wait time.

If you do have people who trust you, a slack DM when the PR goes up isn’t bugging them. Maybe they just don’t pay much attention to GH notifications.

I think the "not recognized as work" part feels similar to my experience but I don't really understand the psychology of it. Work is not done until it is reviewed and merged, so the review part is necessarily a part of the work cycle. I don't get the sense that you're advocating for the "not recognized as work" perspective, just responding to that viewpoint you shared.

Nobody has ever praised me or (as far as I know) a colleague for reviewing work. Certainly not a manager.

My reviewing doesn't show up in Jira under the amount of work I completed.

No performance review of mine has ever mentioned reviewing code.

In summary, there is minimal credit to be had from doing the work and even when there is credit, nobody lets you exchange that credit for much.

Yes, by rule reviewing is considered work, but it is not work anyone gives you much credit for doing. As an individual with incentives not aligned with the company most of the time, that makes it not worth prioritizing.

So I suppose it is recognized as work, but it is the least rewarded of the work you could be doing.

I feel sorry for you working in such an environment, that really sucks.

I have received praise for my review, I have had it mentioned by my manager, including in performance reviews, I have thankfully had leadership emphasise to everyone on the team how much it matters, and I've had great retrospectives on how we can improve the quality and speed of review that resulted in further meaningful improvements.

Changing culture on this is hard, so maybe the answer is just to find a better culture elsewhere, but I can assure you that it does exist.

if your reward system isn't based solely on your performance review, but rather than the speed and quality in which your project is completed, the respect of your peers, and their willingness to engage with you in kind, then absolutely being a timely and considerate reviewer is rewarded.

I've definitely been praised for regularly doing timely reviews, but I imagine your experience is probably more common and why that mindset is widespread.

I use my main laptop and backup periodically to an external drive or Google Drive depending on what it is I'm storing.

Less sensational, but also more concise and more direct.

I think they mean that light exposure has been causally linked to wakefulness, which I'm sure is a statistical thing and not an absolute thing, meaning your experience is still valid even though it's different. Your indignation made me chuckle though, I appreciate the tone.