However, I'd recommend Murderbot series, it is full of humour and shares atmosphere of Bobiverse and this personal approach to characters, as well. Highly recommend.
I am not a native speaker of English so maybe that's why. Typically anything that has lots of humor and makes the reader laugh or be amused frequently -- I think of as comedy. Is there a more nuanced distinction to what is usually called a comedy in literature / movies?
I tried to think of some other examples. Trevor Noah's biography 'Born A Crime' came to mind. I would not explicitly describe it as a comedy myself - because a 'biography' is descriptive enough as well as non-fiction by definition so any humor is mostly not made up. If it were not a biography through -- it would probably go into the comedy bucket in my mind. Maybe I am just mis applying terms here.
Yes, Bobiverse and Murderbot are very close in spirit, and if you like one you are very likely to enjoy the other. Also both have great audio narration.
This is what I am missing as well. I'm a pre-sales technical architect that keeps looking for use-cases where I am able to leverage this technology. 75% of my work is in draw.io and PowerPoint.
That use case is very LLM unfriendly, because you want very specific and precise structure of output, but the LLM knows lots of stuff that is absolutely not what you want at all.
Being in the Rust full time for last 2 or 3 years: it is quite a pain to setup a release process for big Rust workspace.
Version incrementing, packaging wasms, dancing around code generation – all doable, but not standardized.
There's a release-please to automate all that, but it's not an easy task to set it up in all of your repos.
Besides, if in addition to Rust projects, you have projects in other languages like JavaScript, then you have to do it twice and struggle with understanding all of the package management systems provided by all languages you have.
A single swiss-army-knife package manager would be amazing.
I'm in a team that works on a pet prog lang for distributed systems, and we did some research of using an existing package managing systems. We've settled on NPM for now, but god I wish there would be a better generic package manager out there.
Not a generic package manager, but it's probably worth calling out asdf as the generic version manager[0] (maybe you're already aware of it, but it's a generic replacement for nvm, rvm, virtualenv, *vm, which supports any language based on plugins.)
Again, maybe you're already aware of it, but I think it's a nice example of genericising a concern common to many languages which sounds similar to what you're asking for (albeit unfortunately in a slightly different space).
At a minimum it's useful having the `.tool-versions` dotfile in a project directory which lists the versions of each language, db, and package manager version (our Rails project lists versions for ruby, bundler, postgres, node, yarn, redis). Even if all devs don't use asdf, it's a useful reference point.
Check out Denxi. Might be the closest thing to what you're looking for today, and is informed by the state of the art in package management without totally imposing strict discipline on all packages.
we're building open serverless-centered cloud-like p2p network to aolve exactly this issue. to eliminate vendor lock and make it open so anyone can both provide and consume compute resources and develop backends on top of that.
mhm. single-handedly, though.