Without a doubt.

I've used IVPN for years and it works flawlessly.

Posting here isn't part of your break :)

Important part of my working hours!

Your disclaimer modal doesn't fit on mobile causing the viewport to extend outside expected bounds. Otherwise looks nice.

Thank you - fixing the site for mobile devices is on my todo-list and will happen very soon.

This is not limited to Chrome extensions. If you build and publish any kind of software, there is a high chance that someone shady will come along and offer you money for it, or to become an "affiliate" partner.

Right. Extensions are just software and no need to pretend they have it worse than apps in app stores.

You are referring to sunk cost fallacy.

They have some rules in place, try bidding on Fortnite.

I imagine that might be in response to the malware advertising that was going on for fortnite a while back, and how quite a large proportion of the players are kids. As a highly visible brand and a highly vulnerable audience, it makes sense for them to focus efforts there and put in special rules.

I think you are correct in why they put the extra effort in, but the criticism is they should be doing this anyway, for all the ads. Not just because the target audience for a specific keyword is more vulnerable to scams.

Still common to call it BTS (GSM era) contra RBS in the states?

Ebook a tad too expensive for me.