Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | profitbaron's commentslogin

The $1.9 Billion Google spent on acquistions excludes the Motorola deal. As the Motorola deal is expected to close sometime in 2012, so their $12.5 Billion acquistion would be included in the 2012 numbers - of course this is still up for regulatory approval.


It will continue in 2012 as in the filing Google said, “Acquisitions will also remain an important component of our strategy and use of capital, and we expect our current pace of acquisitions to continue."


Build an allfacebook.com/insidefacebook.com for pinterest ;)


They're protecting its competitors (Android ones that is) - http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-08-15/tech/30008645...


Yes, Google bought Motorola to protect itself from patent war.

...Which is why Google is now attempting to shut down a competitors product lines using patents.

Wait, what?

I stand by my post. This is straight up bullshit, just like the rest of the industry. Google is no better than Apple or Microsoft or anyone else. Do no evil has become Do the status quo.


They'll probably win the patent battle in Europe on the 3rd Feb where one of the patents is being disputed, and since they've won previously against older Apple products its not 100% in favour of Apple.


Motorola actually also asserting one of these in European equivalent of this patent against Apple with a decision being made on Friday 3rd February, 2012.


I have actually done this a few times in several different markets. For instance, I used to buy domains in the GoDaddy Auctions for $x and resell them for $xxx+ instantly to other webmasters/domainers. I actually ended up giving the method out for free including the core details and the services used to find the domains which would give the biggest ROI. The method still works today.


PG discusses both OpenMarket and ViaWeb here - http://www.paulgraham.com/bronze.html



There's a dedicated section if you're hiring, see this month's one here: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3412900


It sounds more like they're looking for a cofounder than an employee — specifically, no pay.


Having just reread their thread, I've drawn the same conclusion.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: