not yet, but will be included in the distributed version

the point is you can redirect all the telemetry to your own exporter with nothing leaves your machine and all the benefits.

it can be opt-out, opt-in, but the telemetry needs to be there to actually improve the agent.

it is more like an actual harness with a managed and pinned llama the control is inverse.

Harness is compute and Model is data

there are so much content and valuable stuff in the github repo you can pretty much recreated with your own agent.

generally the challenge now is that 1. how to deal with PR spams by AI bots 2. how to make the project sustainable especially when one has no distribution. when anyone can insta remix and re-package and re-sell your hard work. For knowledge sharing open source it is ok, but if you are serious about what you built, this is question needs to be answered first before make it a true community effort.

I have bad news for you. No matter what you do here it is probably not sustainable. Competing commercially with people who have so much more resources and ability to build is not sustainable. If it's open source you need adoption, and shouldn't care if people want to steal and remix your work as that will drive more adoption.

But from a fellow engineer's perspective we don't need another commercial solution in this space. Every major tech vendor is working on harnesses, and we will get ones that will run circles around yours for free. The open source ones that get popular will have mit/freebsd/etc permissive licenses. (or no one will adopt them) But coming at it from the angle you are indicates you haven't reasoned well about this. Please don't hurt yourself and those around you by starting a startup on this idea.

there are still many bad players in the industry, i wouldn't mind sharing it with trusted group. But I am not yet strong enough with deal and handle all those yet.

called out the most asked questions - where is the source - telemetry opt-in/opt-out in README of https://github.com/AntigmaLabs/ante

I wonder my self, was notified by a friend, but I am grateful.. Probably because of the Meta's open model release?

my view on harness is that it is to capturing the structural mechanism with llm interacting the world. They are a dynamic duo evolving together. The technical depth will continue to grow (e.g. /goal being the new primitive, multi-agent collaboration is basic need) So it is here to stay. And it is just our focus as we don't have enough resource (yet) to improve the model and I think prompts belong to the user.

Had a discussion recently: https://x.com/NoCommas/status/2086568454434537710?s=20