Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> A popular criticism of Silicon Valley, usually levied by people not building anything at all themselves,

I have to take issue here. I don't need to be a "builder" to see that what a given startup is building is either worthless or an attempt at solving a non-problem.

I'm not a helicopter pilot, but if I see a helicopter stuck in a tree, I don't need to be one to know that the guy screwed up.




Sure, but a lot of people like to complain that snapchat/tinder/etc. are wastes of time or poor uses of talent when really they make a lot of people's lives a lot better.


It's far from an objective observation, I'm merely pointing out that the idea that you need to be doing a thing in order to criticize someone else's thing is hogwash.


Hogwash? I don't use that word, but I still think you using it is jibberwasocky.


Is a positive opinion worth anything if it comes from someone not building the product? If so, why is it different for a negative opinion?


"I find this product useless" is useful. "Other people are stupid for finding this product useful" is useless, just as is "other people are stupid for not finding this product useful".




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: