If you understand what the title means well enough to object to its usage, that's solid proof that the title has communicated effectively.

> What is a very bad in that title is that it focuses on Racket, just as if the title was: "Racket - this is how Lisp looks like beyond Clojure".

That's your own interpretation--you could easily have interpreted it as "Racket--an example of a Lisp beyond Clojure".