> The paper confused sex and gender badly. E.g. Man and male are not nearly equivalent groups. How could someone who thought so deeply about the subject miss that?

Ok, but how do you propose the paper to be rewritten taking those into consideration.

Or do you suggest that Google force every employee go through a medical exam to determine their sex and make sure no one chooses to identify as a different gender to pass through the hiring process easier...

Sorry, I don't quite see what you're getting at there basically, it can interpreted in a few ways.