No, but I do not present it as fact nor as being the only possible solution. I think it more likely, as I said. In fact, I was clear about saying it was only my opinion that it was more likely.
That's pretty different than asserting it was done at the behest of a three letter agency and then basing a whole argument on that. Extraordinary claims require extaordinary evidence.
That's pretty different than asserting it was done at the behest of a three letter agency and then basing a whole argument on that. Extraordinary claims require extaordinary evidence.