> How do I, personally, define normal? Who gives a shit?
If you care enough to leave a comment on HN, please also explain _why_ you think it is poor. Because right now your comments add no substance to the discussion.
We are in a discussion about an article providing strong evidence that diagnosis is poorly done. Do a little research yourself, and you'll find it's hardly the only evidence. Feel free to peruse a good New York Times write up from a while back: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/01/health/more-diagnoses-of-...
How do _you_ know if they are normal or merely seem normal though? What is your definition of normal here?