Since everybody seems to be looking for subterfuge in these comments, I'll try to answer the actual question you've asked.
The images in the google search link you supplied are all, without exception that i can see, artistic renderings of a black hole.
There are images of gravitational lensing [1] that show a basic distortion of light from gravity, but none of them reach the intensity of a black hole's 'event horizon'.
The body that we are seeing is at the center of the bright spot in this image [2], and is the source of the blue jet of material coming out. (I originally thought that jet was projected laterally, but in one of the two recent Veritasium videos on this topic he says it's actually heading almost straight at us and is 5000 light years long.) However, it's such an infinitessimally small part of the above image (about 1/10,000,000th the size) that we do not possess the optical resolving power to actually see it. For example, Hubble can resolve down to approximately .05 arcsecond. This image is approximately .00004 arcsecond. To get that resolving power they had to combine signals from radio telescopes all over the world using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry. The contribution of Katie and her team is to extract a useful image from the petabyates of data that came from that exercise.
This is an image rendered from photons that had passed around the black hole, and travelled to Earth and been captured by a radio telescope that humans built.
It's the first time that's been done.
All the images in the DDG search are artistic constructions.
Edit: The thing that's so remarkable is that it does look like what scientists predicted it would look like, and thus some of those artistic representations are similar to what we're now seeing in this image.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=black+hole&t=h_&ia=images&iax=imag...