Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Anecdata: As long as I knew her, my ex had the difficulties described in the article. She blamed how she was taught to read in school -- specifically not having been taught phonics. I figured that was nonsense, and blamed a peculiar-to-her learning disability.

At some point I read Steven Pinker's "The Language Instinct" (which is 20+ years old at this point!), which describes all the research on learning to read... and which pretty conclusively proved to me that my ex was right. For at least some subset of kids, not learning phonics leads to a lifelong reading issues.



While phonics certainly are important to reading comprehension, IMHO a teaching technique which the article does not address is described in:

Reasons to Teach Word Stems and Roots[0]

0 - https://mrsrenz.com/reasons-to-teach-word-stems-and-roots/


That is a useful system for middle readers with limited volcabulary to jump into high school / professional reading, but not so good for very early readers. Note how all the grecoroman stems are defined in terms of germanic words, which are phonetic.

The article is concerned with students who find words like "rabbit" challenging, not with students figuring out "neologism".


Point taken.

Perhaps this comment[0] I posted earlier more directly addresses the article's intent in how to help teach reading skills.

0 - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20791015


>>and which pretty conclusively proved to me that my ex was right

I wouldn't make a conclusion on just one data point.


I ultimately agreed with her based on reading about the research, which is at this point 30+ years old -- and popularized 20+ years ago.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: