Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I want to say it's the freedom to self-host, but really it's the CI.

Throwing a .gitlab-ci.yml file into my repo is by far the easiest way to get CI/CD incorporated into a product. The configuration of test runners (or lack thereof) is both a breeze and extremely powerful.

I'm not even talking about the auto-devops thing that I haven't tried; writing your own gitlab-ci file worked in frictionless ways that CircleCI, Travis, and (especially) Jenkins didn't.




PM for CI/CD here, thanks so much for your feedback! As much as I'm excited about how much you love the product, we can always do better and I'd love to hear your thoughts. Ping me any time (@jlenny) on any issues that are important to you that would make things better.


Do you have any plans to support matrix builds? I know that they can be emulated with anchors but Travis CI's matrix feature seems a lot nicer.


How is CircleCI not easy to use? It's honestly the easiest and most feature complete CI system I've ever used.


Agreed. The big thing is that when I'm starting a Node project, Gitlab's CI setup is like 5 lines in a text file and takes me literally about 30 seconds to set up. It's stupidly easy.

This has been a huge influence in me doing more automatic testing on personal projects and using merge-based workflows more often.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: