Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

how much are they for on ebay?



the old apple machines of course


This is one of the rarer specific Apple II models (happens to also be the fastest and the last released). They’re maybe $300+ or so in good shape. The more common Apple IIe goes for significantly less. I bought one for $50 4 or 5 years ago.


Weird to hear it described as "rare" because it was the only Apple that I had as a kid, but there were a _lot_ of Apple IIe/II+ around at the time. (I remember that we had a 300 baud modem, actual Bell equipment, hooked up to it.)

Still the IIgs might be more rare? I seem to recall the world had moved on by the time that came out.


Are you sure you had a IIc+ and not just a regular IIc? The easiest difference to notice is that the IIc+ has a 3.5" floppy drive, while the IIc has a 5.25" drive. The IIc+ came out in 1988, as opposed to 1984 for the IIc.

I don't have hard data of course, but I've been an avid Apple II and Mac hobbyist for a while, and own every model of Apple II. I think the only Apple II model that's rarer than the IIc+ is the original II, and that might not even be true. (The original II is _definitely_ more expensive, but I assume demand is also much higher.)

The IIgs is pretty easy to come by. It came out two years before the IIc+ and was also on sale for a lot longer than the IIc+. The IIe is definitely the most common. It was in production and on sale for 11 years, and schools bought tons of them.


Yeah it was a IIc - I had overlooked the plus because I didn't even know the IIc+ existed.


There were a lot of IIGS's, schools purchased them in bulk. Plus, they were the machine to upgrade to, so a lot of die hard apple ][ users ended up on the GS.

The IIc+ is actually the last apple II created and wasn't particularly popular because it "split" the market by being a 8 bit computer which couldn't run the newer IIGS's/16-bit software. OTOH, it was clocked faster than the IIGS. In a way it was just apple's response to the laser 128+, which was a much better IIc. The cynical take was that apple didn't want to create another product that would eat into its mac sales like a 32-bit apple II, or much faster IIGS would have done. So they backed the feature set down.

The IIGS continued on as the choice apple product long after the IIc+ came out because people were just buying transwarps/etc, hard drives, etc to create a more advanced IIGS.


Commodore's response to the IIGS was to make the Commodore 65 an upgraded Commodore 64 with Amiga style graphics and sound. It never came out. There is a clone at http://mega65.org/ that tries to complete the Commodore 65 with a 50Mhz CPU. Something about the 6502 not being able to be clocked more than 25Mhz prevented it so they made the 4502 that can go up to 50Mhz.


I mean a IIc+ is pretty rare, regular Apple IIe, or IIc's are not all that rare - neither are IIgs's really


I grew up on the IIgs at school. I can only imagine that there were millions of them. They were certainly outdated at the time; I think I had a Performa 6112CD (PPC 601) at home during the era those were in my school.

(I might be mixing up the eras a little. I most remember the Performa but that was the next computer after my 386, to which we upgraded from a Tandy 1000. I still remember writing my first program on the Tandy.)




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: