There's a bit of an implied selection bias in your question: people get to be hacker gods usually by starting something that later becomes big, and it's in the "just starting out phase" where unit tests are least useful. You never hear about the maintenance programmer that joins five years down the line and finds unit tests indispensable, because there are lots of maintenance programmers and hence little reason to think that any one of them is a hacker god.
This should be written in almost all arguments/discussions about unit-test, especially when people start referring to famous developers who don't write unit-tests.