The GPL has been used successfully in courts of law. It’s not common as most violators just open source when called out, or settle when sued, but it has worked before. A famous example is D-Link using the Linux kernel in their routers. After a lawsuit in Germany, D-Link had to release their changes.[0]
I don’t understand this idea that a license that the author willingly released his code under is unenforceable, but EULAs are?
Unfortunately, it's come out from the FCC, not just the hardware companies in this case, and it really sucks... Raally need to drain the swamp in the FCC.
I don’t understand this idea that a license that the author willingly released his code under is unenforceable, but EULAs are?
[0]: https://web.archive.org/web/20141007073104/http://gpl-violat...