> Silencing dissenting views has never worked in history
There may be a grain of truth to that, but I don't think a historian, even one who agreed with its thrust, would feel comfortable with it as a blanket statement.
I don't really want to have this sort of heated debate this evening. Sorry.
> It's simple. Name one historical example where this strategy of systemic censorship of an ideology worked and didn't blow back.
It worked majority of the time. It typically stopped to work only when power to be ceased to have power.
Both nazism and communism were extremely successful in this. The monarchies did this successfully for very very long time. It ceased to work only when their lost power for unrelated reasons. Saudi Arabia is going strong.
The suppression of nazi ideology post WWII did not lead to blow back either.
> It worked majority of the time. It typically stopped to work only when power to be ceased to have power.
Which is to say it has never worked. Because all power structures eventually collapse and yet the ideologies they tried to suppress remain and rise again. And sometimes, it's actually the resurgence of those suppressed ideologies that destroys the established power structures. As is the case in the USA right now.
> The suppression of nazi ideology post WWII did not lead to blow back either.
By that measure, nothing works ever, because every system dies one day regardless of what they suspend. Such standard is completely useless. Also, "ceased to have power" typically means failure to suppress.
That being said, Nazi Germany did not lost because of internally suppressed people raising, they lost because foreign forces won on battle field. They were quite successful in keeping control.
> You can't be serious.
I am serious. There is nothing to suggest that contemporary German issues have anything to do with post WWII suppression of Nazism. They don't.
I don't really want to have this sort of heated debate this evening. Sorry.