> cast a wide net, gather information from as many viewpoints as possible,
I agree that's the best thing to do. It's a rational choice. I do it and recommend others do it.
But there's still this historical problem of divestment from traditional journalistic practices (going out into the world, gathering facts, interviewing people, observing -- it's expensive). Without that factual raw material it doesn't matter how diverse your set of sources is, your ability to know your own world is impoverished.
I find that Youtube is a very underrated source for those traditional journalistic practices. It's amazing how many great interviews there are with formats that allow interviewees to actually answer a question rather than provide a TV sound-bite. There's such a huge variety of content creators that you can often find a primary-source for major events.
It also helps the recommendation algo if you use separate accounts for watching entertainment vids vs. this more serious content.
I agree that's the best thing to do. It's a rational choice. I do it and recommend others do it.
But there's still this historical problem of divestment from traditional journalistic practices (going out into the world, gathering facts, interviewing people, observing -- it's expensive). Without that factual raw material it doesn't matter how diverse your set of sources is, your ability to know your own world is impoverished.