Hacker News
new
|
past
|
comments
|
ask
|
show
|
jobs
|
submit
login
etherael
on April 13, 2011
|
parent
|
context
|
favorite
| on:
How Dropbox sacrifices user privacy for cost savin...
Granted, but the point of the article is that other services which do not have this ability are not vulnerable to said orders, they cannot do what they do not have the ability to do.
JoachimSchipper
on April 13, 2011
[–]
Yes, this is key. Tarsnap and other encrypt-then-dedup services simply cannot comply with such an order.
Guidelines
|
FAQ
|
Lists
|
API
|
Security
|
Legal
|
Apply to YC
|
Contact
Search:
