Very interesting. As I understand it, IBM consistently avoids high-competition low-margin markets and focuses on low-competition, high-margin markets.
This makes sense to me. Apparently, IBM is not good at high-competition/low-margin markets (and has never been), but they have been a huge R&D powerhouse for decades and probably remain so.
Now I think, the previous CEO should've done this split years ago.
This makes sense to me. Apparently, IBM is not good at high-competition/low-margin markets (and has never been), but they have been a huge R&D powerhouse for decades and probably remain so.
Now I think, the previous CEO should've done this split years ago.