Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But how could anyone reasonably claim they are Rust, particularly given the large reach of it's online services, like docs, crates.io and rustup? Those trademarks are very unlikely to produce anything except another round of debian's icy rebrands.


Rust is already in Debian's repository. The trademarks haven't been an issue at all.


It seems no one had to rebrand Rust yet, but can you guarantee this will always be the case? Firefox was fine in debian until 2006.


But why? Python has been going for decades without issue. https://www.python.org/psf/trademarks/


No, Python is dead because the maintainers decided to create a new, defective, language with a intentionally-misleading name, and then threatened trademark lawsuits against anyone who kept maintaining the original. That sort of thing is (I assume) why lvass was asking about trademark waivers in the first place.


The most used programming language is dead? Please stop the FUD. Python is doing great. Calling it a new language is insane. There's way less difference than in early Cpp versus late Cpp.


The issue with Firefox was that Mozilla didn't want Debian's modified version of Firefox to be called Firefox.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_software_rebranded_by_...


Well it'll be amusing to see the playful knockoff names that Debian will come up with when rebranding Rust.

Will they go with the metal chemistry theme, go back to the original plant pathology one?

https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/27jvdt/internet_archa...


Mozilla Foundation != Mozilla Corporation.

Which is why there was an issue with branding.


No, there was an issue with branding because Debian was diverging too much from mainline Firefox, and not keeping up to date with security patches. Not some corporate malintent.

The way that was resolved was with Firefox LTS.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: