> I’m with the other posters too about the article content, if you haven’t coded in a language like OCaml, Haskell, ML etc. you really don’t know enough about what strong static types offer to discount them.
And if you have, you probably know that its awesome but for most purposes doesn’t compensate for the weak ecosystems of the languages that have it, compared either to poorer (higher cost to satisfy for lower benefits) statically typed languages or dynamically typed languages with or without available optional static type checking.
And if you have, you probably know that its awesome but for most purposes doesn’t compensate for the weak ecosystems of the languages that have it, compared either to poorer (higher cost to satisfy for lower benefits) statically typed languages or dynamically typed languages with or without available optional static type checking.