You don't need to "put" people places - they do that by themselves (and better than you can centrally plan - I know you don't want to hear that).
You don't need to make them go on the internet either.
And apparent "success", in the sense you mean it, isn't, either. It's just kicking the can down the road. Real progress would be the seemingly unproductive, a-month-for-every-year-in-school deschooling period like that of "the sleeping student" at Sudbury[1].
People had the chance this year and the last[2] to let children be free and they blew it.
I really appreciate your push for learning environments that don't constrain students and students can just be who they are. In other words, what are the absolutely minimum number of things that we insist on as rules, so that students feel the freedom to take ownership over the rest.
(And thanks for sharing that Sudbury example; I had never seen it before but I love the message.)
You don't need to make them go on the internet either.
And apparent "success", in the sense you mean it, isn't, either. It's just kicking the can down the road. Real progress would be the seemingly unproductive, a-month-for-every-year-in-school deschooling period like that of "the sleeping student" at Sudbury[1].
People had the chance this year and the last[2] to let children be free and they blew it.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si0PPv-7yWo&list=PLBC7021B61... [2] We've known since April 2020 that kids don't spread it. Icelandic contact-tracing study.