Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Alternatively:

I have 1 opening at my company. I set up a team to handle the hiring process for that position. They choose an internal candidate, who then transfers. I still have 1 opening, despite having completed the hiring process for the open position.

Being rejected from an internal position didn't guarantee that the person would quit, just increased the likelihood. From an "expected hiring committees" perspective, having an internal transfer guarantees two hiring processes. Having an external hire, provided the number of internal candidates is somwehat low, should result in (on average) less than two hiring processes.

>Except in the first scenario the person transferring is most likely familiar with internal tools, practices, systems, deployment, culture, goes on and on. Not only that, I have tangible, full fidelity data on their performance in the form of artifacts produced for their current team. Externally, I'd need to rely on data collected in their interview process.

This part I fully agree with. It could definitely turn out that the benefits of an internal transfer more than outweigh the increase in resources used on hiring.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: