The plan, as near as I can tell, is watching Google leverage Chrome and Android user base into votes for standards.
Microsoft finally realized standards and interoperability was the future. They also realized that a requirement of being able to extract profit in that future was having power to influence standards.
Consequently, open source tools (and more importantly, the dev/user share that comes with them) get Microsoft votes. Either explicitly or via mind share.
And when it's a corporate priority or matter of survival, they use those votes to advance Microsoft's interest.
We've seen this with Chrome / web standards for years now. Most of the time it's good for users, but sometimes it's just that important to corporate reveneue.
I mean MS basically invented leveraging market share to drive web standards. IE was famous for flaunting W3C and implementing things their own way, much to the chagrin of web developers even to this day. It's the kind of behavior which got their hand slapped for anti-trust in the 90's.
It's hard to say it's "copying google", it's more of a return to form now that the regulatory environment seems to have relaxed on anti-trust.
That makes two of us. But if your takeaway from the 90s was 'W3C was in the right and timely, and MS decided to go another way just because,' then we have very different memories.
Microsoft finally realized standards and interoperability was the future. They also realized that a requirement of being able to extract profit in that future was having power to influence standards.
Consequently, open source tools (and more importantly, the dev/user share that comes with them) get Microsoft votes. Either explicitly or via mind share.
And when it's a corporate priority or matter of survival, they use those votes to advance Microsoft's interest.
We've seen this with Chrome / web standards for years now. Most of the time it's good for users, but sometimes it's just that important to corporate reveneue.