Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Hold on there. No one has even established that Maj. Murphy actually wrote the document. Let's see if it's authentic first before we accuse him of anything.



Starting on page 8, there's stuff that he didn't write. It's a funding request that pretty much (to my amateur eye) says the same as what Murphy said.

Is that authentic? Because if it is, we don't have to prove that Murphy wrote what the first part claims he wrote.

Does it say what Murphy said? If so, then we don't have to worry about whether Murphy is sane.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: