I suppose, in the same way negative interest rates are just interest rates with extra steps.
Start from a position of "everyone gets a home" and then ask "in that case, how do we make sure folks who end up in less desirable homes are compensated?"
I suppose you could frame it in the language of prices, but in this case the price is paid to the tenant.
Indeed, it would be a tragedy if someone’s taxpayer-provided housing was insufficiently desirable that we must create a bureau to determine how much additional largess they should receive. That system seems likely to end well.
Start from a position of "everyone gets a home" and then ask "in that case, how do we make sure folks who end up in less desirable homes are compensated?"
I suppose you could frame it in the language of prices, but in this case the price is paid to the tenant.