Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I see things completely opposite, other than my agreement that the current meta implementation is categorically bad.

The way I see it, Facebook is dead. It lost its place in society by forcibly combining free online expression with personal identity and responsibility. What remains is a culturally normative repository of groupthink with fewer and fewer participants deriving novel value, and that is reflected in the userbase trends.

What meta represents philosophically is a return to semi-anonymized and immediate human-to-human interaction, without the pretense of permanence or the necessity to project only socially righteous behavior. It is a natural, and by nature ephemeral medium. It is the only hope for meta long-term, and beating apple out of the gate is an encouraging sign to me.




> semi-anonymized and immediate human-to-human interaction

why are optionally anonymous forums like HN not sufficient for this? why do we need virtual avatars, content markets, gamification?

if people want these things there are always video games




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: