Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Ideally I would love if we could stop using "random" entirely when referring to PRNGs. Call them "deterministic bit mixers" or something.



We can just call them CSPRNGs to be precise.

The pseudo lets you know it's not real quantum randomness, and the rest of it lets you know it's probably good enough for all practical purposes.

Actually, crypto pseudorandoness can be more appropriate for some things, because you can prove you didn't rig it.


"Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is, of course, living in a state of sin." -- Von Neumann

Lots of sinners in tech and academia...


I don't think that adds any value over pseudo-random.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: