> do you think vulkan will progress into being easier and easier to use?
I don't think that is the goal for Vulkan, nor should it be. Vulkan is a low-level, high-performance API that can be used as the backend for high-level, high-performance libraries and frameworks.
> is it mature enough?
Mature enough for what? It's mature and stable enough that you can develop high-level libraries on top of it. wgpu [1], for example, has a Vulkan backend.
I don't think that is the goal for Vulkan, nor should it be. Vulkan is a low-level, high-performance API that can be used as the backend for high-level, high-performance libraries and frameworks.
> is it mature enough?
Mature enough for what? It's mature and stable enough that you can develop high-level libraries on top of it. wgpu [1], for example, has a Vulkan backend.
[1] wgpu is a WebGPU implementation; https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu