Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Zulip is a very good fit for open source communities, and much much better for communication than Slack. I hate how Slack encourages you to say everything in the main channel, threads are close to impossible to use.

They're a tiny section off to the side and you can't easily navigate between them, it's really badly done.



I've been super impressed with Zulip's thread system in technical chats. But how is Zulip itself in situations where you mostly want channel-wide banter, with the odd thread spawning off of that?


It's been fine for us, just detach that thread or create a new one and link.


It's improved and is now resizable, still much much better than discord

The main problem with alternatives is integrations, bots, and similar. The ecosystems are not as available, at least that is the impression


Yeah, the ecosystem and integrations is definitely where Slack has the advantage. Still, I'd rather give up the integrations than the much improved communication.


I think the real problem is that people can only really support having one chat application open continuously at a time. Maybe two for some, if you account for the non-chat things like text & email. Notification / source burnout. I have to use slack professionally, I'm not going to add another tool.

That's why someone was suggesting mattermost (iirc on a friday), as something that bridges all the chat platforms and gives you a single tool


Hmm, what do you mean? I'm talking about using Zulip instead of Slack. If I'm going to use another similar service, I might as well use Slack itself. Zulip is miles ahead.


I'm saying my employer, who pays for slack so this whole thing is a no-op, means I have to have slack open. I'm not adding another chat platform to my repertoire, that is the real problem of incumbent

If you read the CUE discussion I linked, you will see several people making this same point


Well yes, how could you? If the rest of the company is on Slack, you using a different service wouldn't work. The question is where does the employer (or, specifically, the CUE team) go if they don't want to pay for Slack any more.


Let's clarify a few things

1: I am not employed by CUE. I am their biggest fan and cheerleader

2: CUE has never paid for Slack

The context is that I have slack open, I am in 12+ groups. I've tried adding other platforms like discord and keeping them open.

The point is that, as a human, I only have so much attention, and having more than one chat program open at a time, in addition to the other messaging streams we are subjected to, it's a non-starter.

For my own sanity, only one chat platform can be regularly open. Thus follows the network effect and incumbent arguments




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: