Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> This is an "easy to say, near-impossible to do" task that's been shoved with little effort from the proposer onto the museum staff.

In principle, this is true, but in many cases the responsible party is very well-known and yet there is active resistance from the British Museum to repatriate the plundered items. For example, the Parthenon Marbles.



> the responsible party is very well-known

> For example, the Parthenon Marbles.

Can you clarify this?


According to Wikipedia, the Parthenon marbles in Britain has been repeatedly asked (by the Greek government, then by UNESCO itself) to be returned to its original Athens, Greece location. They were literally taken out of Greece by an Earl of England claiming (with no paperwork!) authority from the empire occupying Greece at the time.

There is a literal museum in Greece containing every part that wasn't stolen this way, in their exact original placement, waiting for the stolen pieces to be returned to complete it. And the British are still resistant.


> from the empire occupying Greece at the time

Does this make it invalid?

For example the Koh-i-Noor diamond passed through many hands, often through conquest. And perhaps the ruler who originally owned it didn't obtain it through entirely fair means.


There was no paperwork or anything to actually verify this claim, please note. The guy could've been lying.


maybe, but that was said originally; but if it was verified, what difference would it have made that they where an occupier?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: