This article spends quite a bit of time talking about SBF's risk appetite and how it might be drug related. I think that's missing a fairly obvious piece of logic.
In order to decide to go into crypto trading you need to have an extremely high tolerance for risk. The crypto industry is self-selected for risk in the first place, you don't need complex explanations of why they use lots of leverage on highly volatile assets, that's literally the reason why they're there. If SBF had a low appetite for risk he wouldn't have entered crypto or started a start up, he would have stayed in trad-fi getting paid massive sums of money for some fairly basic quant work. It's not that Sam has a high risk appetite, it's that in order to get into the position Sam was in you need a high risk appetite.
And that obviously poses a big problem for people who want to use a crypto exchange - because they can only find exchanges run by people with a massive risk appetite making it likely to blow up in your face.
I think there's a huge difference with someone who has a huge appetite for risk, and someone who is taking risks, essentially without oversight, while on dopamine-replacing drugs. Many people who work in conventional finance are well aware of how brain chemistry changes (caused by illness, medication, illicit drugs, or emotional and life changes) can push someone from being in control while pursuing risky but profitable strategies to being a degenerate gambling addict.
Putting so much blame on the drugs seems like a way of casting Bankman-Fried as an addict/victim. In reality he's a thief and has been from the start of this scheme. He has a sociopathic disregard for others and cynically covers that with cheap talk of being an altruist.
In order to decide to go into crypto trading you need to have an extremely high tolerance for risk. The crypto industry is self-selected for risk in the first place, you don't need complex explanations of why they use lots of leverage on highly volatile assets, that's literally the reason why they're there. If SBF had a low appetite for risk he wouldn't have entered crypto or started a start up, he would have stayed in trad-fi getting paid massive sums of money for some fairly basic quant work. It's not that Sam has a high risk appetite, it's that in order to get into the position Sam was in you need a high risk appetite.
And that obviously poses a big problem for people who want to use a crypto exchange - because they can only find exchanges run by people with a massive risk appetite making it likely to blow up in your face.