Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why do an investment group which is successful in making large, traditional, real money investments think they know better than the numerous seasoned venture funds and experienced crypto investors who did not give $95m to FTX?

What was it about FTX's lack of internal controls or experienced decision-makers which only TVG was able to identify as a source of value?




Lol. FTX’s investors were a whose who of “seasoned venture funds and experienced crypto investors”.

Sequoia, Third Point Iconiq etc. Coinbase Ventures gave them money. Blackrock was an investor.

If you want to see FTX as an indictment of the entire venture industry I think there is an argument to be had there. But picking on OTP is just a lazy rhetorical device. They made a similar investment to other funds in the industry they are in, that was a reasonable size of their portfolio in an investment style known to be risky.


Coinbase Ventures (a fund whose wheelhouse is, uh, investing in crypto ventures) did not invest anything like $95m.

Your fourth example, Blackrock, is tellingly neither a seasoned venture fund nor an experienced crypto investor.


-- their portfolio is pretty fantastic - so they made 1 bum investment based on cooked books - VC is literally about standard deviation --

https://www.otpp.com/en-ca/investments/our-investments/teach...




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: