To me this sounds like if I was saying "as an owner of a bank account, I witnessed decisions of the French budget that I do not understand. It must be secret money".
He is a pilot, and saw stuff. Since there are not always data driven evidence (we just do not know, it could have been this or that) it is easier to say UFO.
Maybe this is incompetence of the ones who monitor the sky, and they want to hide it. Maybe we cannot explain it because we do not know if this was a bird or a plane.
Saying "UFO" is a bold word, that requires bold evidence. The fact that the super secretive army does not want to show their data just fuels the conspiracy.
He is a pilot, and saw stuff. Since there are not always data driven evidence (we just do not know, it could have been this or that) it is easier to say UFO.
Maybe this is incompetence of the ones who monitor the sky, and they want to hide it. Maybe we cannot explain it because we do not know if this was a bird or a plane.
Saying "UFO" is a bold word, that requires bold evidence. The fact that the super secretive army does not want to show their data just fuels the conspiracy.