> It should be good for the middle and low ends, but I expect pretty bad for the high-end of any given job type.
The high end are doing good by definition. The exceptionally talented are winning anyways, if they win a little less outlyingly they will still be winning. It's not as if this would be a project of "pay everybody exactly the same".
Who might in theory consider this regulation a problem is companies who like to hire a mix of bottom of the barrel cheap and gold plated rockstars, but in reality those would already have separate roles for these opposites and are therefore not affected are all.
The high end are doing good by definition. The exceptionally talented are winning anyways, if they win a little less outlyingly they will still be winning. It's not as if this would be a project of "pay everybody exactly the same".
Who might in theory consider this regulation a problem is companies who like to hire a mix of bottom of the barrel cheap and gold plated rockstars, but in reality those would already have separate roles for these opposites and are therefore not affected are all.