> If I were to start with ChatGPT I would, necessarily, only say what has been said.
Perhaps with ChatGPT you would actually go ahead and write that book, adding those crucial 10% of key ideas which are yours and letting it help you fill out the 90% of standard but necessary content.
> If I were to start with ChatGPT I would, necessarily, only say what has been said.
This is a bold claim I don't aee any evidence for. If you sample a model outaude its data (which happens all the time(, you expect to get results outside of its data.
Perhaps with ChatGPT you would actually go ahead and write that book, adding those crucial 10% of key ideas which are yours and letting it help you fill out the 90% of standard but necessary content.
> If I were to start with ChatGPT I would, necessarily, only say what has been said.
This is a bold claim I don't aee any evidence for. If you sample a model outaude its data (which happens all the time(, you expect to get results outside of its data.