Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I could ask you the same.

Raised Catholic through confirmation. Long time atheist, although I attend my wife's evangelical protestant church. So admittedly an outsider's view on all of this.

> Ideas like “love thy neighbour” don’t feel very “everybody is evil” to me.

I don't know why those would be incompatible. People can be evil, but you can love them all the same.

> I’m surprised by how plainly you call that a “core belief”.

Really? Sin and the need for Jesus's salvation are universal through the branches of Christianity I've experienced. They use different terms for it—Catholicism talks about "original sin", protestants talk about "mankind's sin nature". I know nothing about Orthodox Christianity, but I would expect them to fit in there somewhere. Catholics and Protestants argue about salvation through faith or salvation through works, but they both see it as something desirable.

There are lots of branches of Christianity, and so I don't have a full picture, but I've never heard of one that didn't share this belief, and I'm not sure I'd understand what their faith is all about at that point. But if you've got some info, I'm happy to learn more. I kinda hate to quote Wikipedia here, but it mirrors my understanding:

> The doctrine of sin is central to the Christian faith, since its basic message is about redemption in Christ. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_views_on_sin)

Maybe my outsider's take on it is off, but calling these beliefs satanic seems way out there to me.



Thanks for this info. I see what you're saying. To clarify, I meant a _little_ satanic. As in, "giving satan" vibes. Not some truly evil ritual.

> I kinda hate to quote Wikipedia here

I don't mind wikipedia but it has some weird branches. Recommended reading, start here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_ethics

From the top of that page:

> Christian ethics, also known as moral theology, is a multi-faceted ethical system. It is a virtue ethic, which focuses on building moral character, and a deontological ethic which emphasizes duty. It also incorporates natural law ethics, which is built on the belief that it is the very nature of humans – created in the image of God and capable of morality, cooperation, rationality, discernment and so on – that informs how life should be lived, and that awareness of sin does not require special revelation.

> awareness of sin does not require special revelation.

Then jump into https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law

The link you provided highlights the word "Hamartiology" which I just learned is the study of sin. I've never heard of this study before but I have studied some Buddhist teachings. Buddhists teach that when you steady your attention on a mental object, that object grows (for example gratitude). To me, it follows that studying sin leads to increased sin.

I think many modern Christians understand this and, therefore, sin is no longer such a central tenant to the faith.


(Fwiw I didnt call anything satanic)

Thanks for the explanation. I guess our mismatch is that you think sin and evil are the same thing and I think they’re very far apart. To me, stealing a cookie from mom when she’s not watching is sinful but not evil. Murdering people is evil but I don’t think that’s what your average Christian refers to when talking about sin.


> Fwiw I didnt call anything satanic

I know, it was flkenosad who posted the message that I originally responded to.

> you think sin and evil are the same thing and I think they’re very far apart

Well, I am an outsider, so it's not so much what I believe, it's my understanding of what Christian theology teaches. And my understanding might be wrong! Catholics have "mortal sin" vs. "venial sin", for instance, but I'm not sure that's the same distinction.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: