> no firmware update actually improved the OtherOS functionality in any way so they lost nothing when a new firmware took it away.
At that time the respective scientists were quite concerned not to accidentally install this firmware update, and whether Sony would invent more draconian measures to disable consoles with old firmware.
This lead to a huge distrust in Sony, and accelerated the switch from the Cell to the emerging GPGPU technology for respective scientific calculation. Thus, this was some PR disaster for Sony.
Those scientists don't have good processes then. There are typically stringent procedures in regards to updating and handling software on laboratory computing equipment.
>This lead to a huge distrust in Sony, and accelerated the switch from the Cell to the emerging GPGPU technology for respective scientific calculation. Thus, this was some PR disaster for Sony.
Any proof of this? As far as I could tell, Cell was a dead end as a lot of the top tier benefits never really materialized irrespective of Sony shenanigans. Serious scientists used the server offerings from IBM. IBM eventually stopped supporting their server offerings for the most part. Why would they do this other than people stopped finding the architecture good for their needs?
At that time the respective scientists were quite concerned not to accidentally install this firmware update, and whether Sony would invent more draconian measures to disable consoles with old firmware.
This lead to a huge distrust in Sony, and accelerated the switch from the Cell to the emerging GPGPU technology for respective scientific calculation. Thus, this was some PR disaster for Sony.