Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin



Not sure how that's obvious from your links. It'd be helpful if you gave some explanation.


It's nuanced UI-related. There's a lot of psychology involved to understand the holistic effects. You need to include things like someone's brand perception into deciding how effective a UI will be, such as trusted brands will let someone assume that what they are looking at is trustworthy - and therefore of enough value for them to care and look further into it / to get interested.

Hope that helps?


The two products are incomparable. One is unknown, the other is known by pretty much anyone who would be interested in buying a smart phone.


It's the brand of the company that matters; It's the foundation for what a user will expect, and will let them trust what they are seeing in front of them as valuable to them - prior to even knowing anything specific about it.


I'd say you should compare Apple's and Google's sales reports.


I'd say a lot more goes into a company's revenue than two single product landing pages. Don't use Apple's earnings as justification for all it's actions.

McDonald's sells the most burgers in the world, that definitely means it's the best in everything burger-related right?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: