Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is it just me or did gen AI allow companies to cheat a lot more with their demos/showcases? I feel like there’s absolutely no way to tell if what’s shown is representative, cherry-picked or outright faked. I mean, it’s non-reproducible by nature, so it even gives plausible deniability to unscrupulous marketing departments.

I’d rather watch a YouTuber or streamer do a real project in a tool too see if and how it works in practice.



PM here on the AI streams. These were all live demoes, not faked. Was not great for my anxiety given the non-deterministic nature.

We did talk about faking it, but Dylan was heavily opposed as he felt it wouldn't be genuine.


do you know when they're rolling out? I saw something about waitlist mentioned, but no link. Thanks!


If you watched the keynote, it was pretty clearly not cherry-picked or faked. It didn't come up with perfect images or text every time. It felt very much like what happens when you enter a prompt into a chat-based AI.

As additional proof that it was not faked, the CEO was clearly distracted by the notifications from hundreds of people requesting access to the live file he was demoing from, which was a pretty good live demo moment.


I don't think it's that big of a change. I've sat on both sides of many meetings where designers showcased mockups of functionality that didn't exist and wasn't even sanity-checked for a possibility to be engineered in the first place.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: