Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It wasn't a warning with a 70% accuracy though. It was saying it's 3x or 4x more likely than usual, which is still pretty unlikely. I don't think more information is ever a bad thing. Should countries have published covid statistics or hid them because it's very distracting, kind of worrying, and nothing really happened in the end? It was useful to know when cases were going up in your community so you can take precautions.

I took the megaquake warning as me realizing that I need to have at least 3 days of water stockpiled. I had 0. I don't really want to be a burden upon my neighbors in case of an earthquake, so it made sense just to store some water.




I'm not arguing the warning isn't useful, I'm saying if it's not accurate. It will get ignored.

You know there is a very high chance this megaquake will happen in the next 30 years, why don't you have water stockpiled all the time?

Because it's not an accurate enough prediction.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: