Reading through the submission, it looks like hardly anyone replied or upvoted, the replies seemed like constructive criticism, you acknowledged that you used AI, and you used "we" throughout replies to the feedback. Even in the absence of the article for context, what you are saying now doesn't seem like a fair assessment on behalf of the community, at least from the comment section's side. I will acknowledge there are lowlife trolls who lurk HN, but also flagging an article that is largely created by AI seems reasonable.