Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Undoubtedly, the sloppification of the internet will likely get worse over the next few years. And as such, the returns to curating quality sources of content will only increase. My advice? Use an RSS feed reader, read Twitter lists instead of feeds, and find spaces where real discussion still happens (e.g. LessWrong and Lobsters still both seem slop-free).

I had not heard of LessWrong before - thanks for the recommendation!

Whenever I see a potentially interesting link (based on the title and synopsis if one is available) I feed it into my comment aggregator[1] and have a quick scan through (mostly) human commentary before committing to reading the full content, especially if it is a longer piece.

The reasons behind this are two-fold; one, comments from forums tend to call out AI slop pretty quickly, and two, even if the content body itself is slop, the interesting hook (title or summary) is often enough to spark some actually meaningful discussion on the topic that is worth reading.

[1]: https://kulli.sh




Fair warning, the LessWrong people have a lot of very strange ideas. Even more than HN.


I used to read a lot of LessWrong. These days I would recommend people to avoid it. The content is thought-provoking, written by well-meaning intelligent people.

On the other hand, it's like watching people nervously count their fingers to make sure they're all still there. Or rather, it's not enough to count them, we have to find a way to make sure we can be confident with the number we get. Whatever benefit you get from turning off the news, it's 10x as beneficial to stop reading LessWrong.


This and the child comment are a great example of why I always read the comments first :)




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: