This isn’t something happening in a vacuum. The people mocking this are people who are cynical about Microsoft forcing AI into the OS, and its marketing teams overhyping Copilot as a replacement for human dev
How is that dismantling my argument or relating to the point i made?
Just because some people on reddit 'laugh' at these discussions, in one of the PRs a contributor/maintainer actually said that they enabled it on purpose, are not forced and are happy to test it out.
And someone somewhere has and want to test stuff. Whats the issue? Test it out, play around with it, keep it or disable it.
And i think .net as a repository is a very good example. The people on github copilot side are probably very happy about this experiement. For me its also great, it seems like github copilot is still struggling a bit.
And copilot is called copilot because they do not advertice it as replacement.
