Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The game theoretic aspect of this is quite interesting. If Meta will make OpenAI's model improvements open source, then the value of every poached employee will be worth significantly less as time goes on. That means it's in the employees best interest to leave first, if their goal is to maximize their income.


Open source could also be a bait and switch.

ie - Zuck has no intention to keep opening up the models he creates. Thus, he knows he can spend the money to get the talent. Because he has every intention to make it back.


Zuck has the best or the second best distribution on the planet.

If he neutralizes the tech advantage of other companies his chances of winning rise.


How well was Zuck able to use his massive distribution channels to win in his cryptocurrency project, or the Metaverse after that?

Meta has become too fickle with new projects. To the extent that LLAMA can help them improve their core business, they should drive that initiative. But if they get sidetracked on trying to build “AI friends” for all of their human users, they are just creating another “solution in search of a problem”.

I hope both Altman and Zuck become irrelevant. Neither seems particularly worthy of the power they have gained and aren’t willing to show a spine in face of government coercion.


Allegedly they were offered 100m just in the first year. I think they will be fine


That was immediately proven to be false, both by Meta leadership and the poached researchers themselves. Sam Altman just pulled the number out of his ass in an interview.


That's my point. The ones that left early got a large sum of money. The ones that leave later will get less. That would incentivize people to be the first to leave.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: